Blog

The conversation over math policy leaks appearing in the media deserves more information. We have found that then-private information about nonactionable decisions—including selective mentions of specific data science courses was shared anonymously with news organizations.

In debates over California’s recently approved math framework, we saw how misleading narratives can feed hysteria, harm public discussion, and interfere with the goal of improving math learning. And they can find their way unchecked into mainstream news.

Four graduating classes, or about 13.5 million students, have been affected by the pandemic. The class of 2022 earned an average ACT score of 19.8, the lowest in more than 30 years. Math scores have declined to 19.3. The scores also reveal a deepening chasm that leaves Black, Latinx, and other underrepresented students even further behind when it comes to the math skills they need for college admissions.

As colleges and universities work to create racially inclusive student bodies without race-conscious admissions practices, the outsize role that mathematics plays in restricting college access needs more attention. We need to make sure that access to college as well as to STEM careers is driven by students’ potential, not by their race or other background characteristics.

This is the story of how math courses taken by fewer than 1 percent of applicants to the University of California played a dominant role in the state’s K–12 math education discussions for more than two years. To be more precise, it is less about the math courses they took, and more about those they didn’t take. I’m referring to students who took statistics in high school, but not Algebra II.